At tonight's republican presidential debate, right-wing nut-job republican presidential candidate Herman Cain tried to "defend" (???) himself regarding the numerous sexual harassment allegations against him by stating for every person who has accused him of sexual harassment, there are probably thousands who haven't - WOW!!!

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (421)
He seems to have mistaken himself with the Queen... she uses the third person too... the "royal we"... only I suspect that Herman Cain only has a mouse in his pocket...
- 47 votes
I must stand up to defend Cain on this one, he is probably telling the truth.
I am sure there are at, the every most, a thousand women, that he has NOT harassed yet.
- 96 votes
Would that work with "for every woman who says that I a great in bed"? Same logic.
- 19 votes
that headline is not what he said.. I heard the quote earliet
for every woman that has said I harassed them, there are 1000s that havn''t"
they haven't said he didn't harass him.. they haven't said a thing yet,,so this could be a freudian slip..
- 33 votes
So is he saying their is one woman who he harassed per every two to three thousand Americans? That works out to a lot of harassed women. ;-)
- 45 votes
Perhaps the thousands of women he is referring to wasn't his type or else he would have harassed them as well. So far nine women are excusing Herman Cain of sexual abuse. What it is about the number 9 that keeps haunting him?
- 25 votes
Oh. My. God.
Jeffrey Dahmer: For every teenage boy who says I raped him, murdered him, and ate his corpse, there are "thousands" who say I didn't!
- 50 votes
So far nine women are excusing Herman Cain of sexual abuse.
Nine?! Just this afternoon it was, like, five. WTF!?
- 13 votes
Nine
Nine
Nine
Probably named after what all these women were saying
NO
NO
NO
- 30 votes
Herman Cain: For Every Person Who Says I Harassed Them, There Are ‘Thousands’ Who Say I Didn’t
Thank goodness for small things.
- 15 votes
"The American people deserve better than someone being tried in the court of public opinion based on unfounded accusations," Cain said.
Big cheers.
Who farted? The first part of Cain's statement is dead-on: even before the numerous accusations of sexual harassment, the American people deserved much, much better.
"And I value my character and my integrity more than anything else," he added. Then came the big finish:
"For every one person that comes forward with a false accusation, there are probably thousands who will say that none of that sort of activity ever came from Herman Cain," Cain said, referring to himself in the third person, as is his custom lately.
Humongous red flag. Once a political candidate starts referring to himself/herself in the third person, that is the time to start seriously considering another person. But fast.
"I am Herman Cain, and Herman Cain approves this message from Herman Cain."
- 28 votes
What does he call those thousands? The ones that got away
- 40 votes
"Once a political candidate starts referring to himself/herself in the third person ..."
Yep, once a candidate starts to distance himself from ... himself!
- 24 votes
republican presidential candidate Herman Cain tried to "defend" (???) himself regarding the numerous sexual harassment allegations against him by stating for every person who has accused him of sexual harassment, there are probably thousands who haven't - WOW!!!
How do you find these idiots? I did not do it would have been sufficient. This man reminds me of Jacob Zuma of SA. At least Bill Clinton admitted he did it because he could.
- 13 votes
For every woman he harassed, there are thousands of women who are pissed about it!
- 21 votes
Sure you're right Herman. But I didn't know there were that many people that still believed the Earth is Flat. But rest assured Herman, I am not one of them... Take the lie detector test Herman-nothing less will do! Otherwise,sign the sexual abuse registry and seek help.
- 14 votes
Hell would freeze over and pigs fly before the Republican Party would elect a black man as president. So this is really irrelevant to the larger picture of the presidential race. I am stuck in a position of "I don't know, and I don't care." It would be the right thing to do to make sure this isn't a smear campaign by his competition.
- 11 votes
...Herman Cain tried to "defend" himself regarding the numerous sexual harassment allegations against him....
With so much political baggage; with so many skeletons in your closet; Why run for public office, especially the Presidency?
- 15 votes
This answer endears him to TEAnut base in so many ways.
- He belittles sexual harassment victims.
- He shows he's one of them, a nut and moron.
- He shows he's the biggest douche in room.
Just playing to his base.
- 31 votes
We are not interested in thousands of women who don't have to come forward to tell us that Herman has not sexually harassed them.
For whatever reasons, there are sexual harassment settlements on Herman's resume. He's been making statements about the settlements that are best described as truthiness (he didn't remember, he suddenly remembered bits and pieces, etc.)
Flame off dude, flame off.
- 19 votes
For every person who says I harrassed them, there are thousands that say I didn't? That remark makes no damn sense whatsoever. ???????
- 14 votes
"For Every Person Who Says I Harassed Them, There Are ‘Thousands’ Who Say I Didn’t" -- Herman Cain
"Day ain't over yet" -- Dirty Harry Callahan
- 21 votes
"Bob Dole likes Herman Cain. Bob Dole remembers when Bob Dole used the 3rd person a lot in his speeches. Now Bob Dole does have some advice for Herman Cain- Lay off the Viagra (c). Bob Dole knows that just because you can now get it up with regularity does not make you any more attractive to the opposite sex- seeing Elizabeth running screaming from our house woke Bob Dole up to that fact."
- 16 votes
Closer to the truth:
For every one person that applauded for me tonight, there are millions that would boo me off the stage.
buh bye!
- 25 votes
If my math is right, that means there are ~329,000 people that the old letch HAS sexually harassed and ~329,670,000 he has yet to get to.
- 18 votes
he started talking in third person on Kimmel saying this:
H: I don’t regret that choice of words because (laughter) when people believe Herman Cain and his message, they know that it is sincere.
- 13 votes
1) That argument is total nonsense. If this garnered any applause, it's a damn shame that anyone could possibly consider this even slightly rational as a defense.
2) It sounds like he's saying there are thousands of women who have yet to come forward.
3) You see? Of the 5 women I'm accused of murdering, there are THOUSANDS that I'm not accused of murdering.
- 13 votes
Herman Cain is a fine example as to why America does not need a man like him in the top job. If this is his best shot, run for the hills America, get out whilst you can, is all I can say
- 12 votes
For every person that thinks Cain will be our next president there are thousands who know he won't.
- 19 votes
For Every Person Who Says I Harassed Them, There Are 'Thousands' Who Say I Didn't
Sounds aspirational.
So many women, so little time.
- 18 votes
And I'm one of the many thousands that know Cain isn't going to make it to the general election. I estimate he has a few more weeks before dropping out.
- 10 votes
Here's the thing, with his comment calling Nancy Pelosi "Princess" during the debate, had Pelosi been an employee of his such a comment, clearly used in a demeaning manner could constitute sexual harassment.
- 21 votes
Good point Seb, looks like we found a 6th accusation, of course Mr. Cain will deny it ever happened. Calling people anything other than their legal name is a risky move in the professional world and more often than not is a veiled attempt to ridicule or "harass" them. Not to mention that it is very unprofessional!
- 9 votes
I just don't' think that he sees anything less than attempted rape as sexual harassment.
I would love to see him guest on Maddow. In fact, I would love to see this entire field debate Maddow and that should simply be the end of the matter. She is literally everything they all stand firmly against.
- 18 votes
I just don't' think that he sees anything less than attempted rape as sexual harassment.
sticking your hand up a lady's skirt is pretty damn close to attempted rape as far as I am concerned.
I most definitely is sexual assault!
- 13 votes
I would dearly love to put polygraph sensors on all the candidates in these debates to test them for validity. Problem is the equipment on Cain would be making so much noise that we wouldn't hear what he was saying.
Oh wait.......no loss.
- 8 votes
The American people deserve better than someone being tried in the court of public opinion based on unfounded accusations," Cain said.
Big cheers.
Who farted? The first part of Cain's statement is dead-on
Yes, it is dead-on, and when he said it, I thought "Whoa, he's going to step out of the race".
Herman Cain is...off. When I watch him talk about these charges, I can't help thinking that there's something missing in him.
- 10 votes
The total hypocrisy of the left! Where was the hardcore self righteous media when it came time to look into Obama's past which was shaded in darkness. The left propaganda smear machine will stop at nothing, including payoffs for lies and deceit.
Is it true, I don't know, but I am certainly not going to believe a freaking word you and your liberal smear machines have to say!
As soon as this one woman stood with Gloria Allred (the hit woman of the left) I
questioned the integrity of the entire situation. Of course the left never once
questions the lies of the Obama smear machine. It’s very sad! Let Obama RUN ON HIS RECORD and let all the out of work people, the underemployed, the record amount of food stamps, the collapsing dollar, the enormous debt he has created speak for itself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have had enough and everyone I know has as well. Let’s divide the country in half and go our
separate ways. We are hardly the United States of America. You liberal
progressives can go create your own liberal utopia and us conservatives will live our way. The Independents can decide for themselves. We want nothing to do with you, your lifestyles and your self serving, self indulging ways. Go do the work yourselves.
This country has been divided in half and there will be no more compromises, so we might as well get a divorce NOW! Of course we will NOT BE PAYING YOU ANY ALIMONY.
- 1 vote
TomTom-72 wrote:
With so much political baggage; with so many skeletons in your closet; Why run for public office, especially the Presidency?
I'm really beginning to think Cain was actually so politically naive enough as to think he could mount a presidential campaign without any of this stuff coming out.
It's just one more reason for him to hang it up.
- 11 votes
I would dearly love to put polygraph sensors on all the candidates in these debates to test them for validity. Problem is the equipment on Cain would be making so much noise that we wouldn't hear what he was saying.
Between the lot of them, those polygraphs would go up in flames - definite fire hazard. Keep the fire department on standby if it ever happens.
- 6 votes
Well here is the difference, while the media did jump on board with the birth certificate and Wright issues, it was the GOP that made them issues of his qualification to be in office.
- 9 votes
Defense attorneys should pay attention. Now you have a new defense. But your honor, for every person my client has murdered, there are MILLIONS he hasn't.
- 10 votes
The total hypocrisy of the left! Where was the hardcore self righteous media when it came time to look into Obama's past which was shaded in darkness. The left propaganda smear machine will stop at nothing, including payoffs for lies and deceit.
And for how many years did the right perpetuate that phony birth-certificate garbage, just for starters? Don't even mention the word hypocrisy, you're in over your head.
I have had enough and everyone I know has as well. Let's divide the country in half and go our separate ways. We are hardly the United States of America.
I think the right can blame themselves for that one. Rush Limbaugh started driving that wedge in the late 1980s, and the parade of Rush-wannabes that's followed have been working their butts off to divide this country ever since. It's never been more than cheap political theater, and you bought into it. Don't blame those who think for themselves.
We want nothing to do with you, your lifestyles and your self serving, self indulging ways. Go do the work yourselves.
We do. Too bad you're too busy letting Rush and the rest of that hate parade tell you otherwise, or you might have noticed.
- 19 votes
VetteLover
You liberal progressives can go create your own liberal utopia and us conservatives will live our way.
Nah, it's much more fun to elect people who piss you off just to watch you whine and knash your teeth. That's why I'm voting for Obama again. It's not that it think he's a terribly good leader, it's just that I can't pass up the opportunity to make you miserable.
- 14 votes
so we might as well get a divorce NOW! Of course we will NOT BE PAYING YOU ANY ALIMONY.
Keep in mind that by and large, the blue states pay more to the feds than the red states, meaning red states need blue state money to survive.
Let's let the TEA GOP run on their record--the downgrading of the US credit rating, the climbing unemployment thanks to their obstructionism and churlishness.
- 14 votes
You know Herman, for everyone who votes for you there are thousands who will not.
- 21 votes
“For every one person that comes forward with a false accusation, there are probably thousands who will say that none of that sort of activity ever came from Herman Cain,”
SO MANY WOMEN, SO LITTLE TIME !!
- 10 votes
It's never been more than cheap political theater, and you bought into it. Don't blame those who think for themselves.
Shhhhh thats supposed to be a secret. Next you will be telling them wrestling isn't real either.
- 5 votes
Grae: I do the math differently. I start with the assumption that Cain is only likely to harass adult women (no evidence yet of men or children being harassed) so that's a population base of about 110 million in round numbers. Now he said "thousands", which could be anywhere from 2,000 to 20,000. (If it's under 2,000, it's hundreds, and if it's over 20,000 the measure would be tens of thousands.) So, being generous and dividing the 55 mill by the best case 20,000 he's probaly admitting to harassing only about 5,500 women. Nice guy, huh?
- 9 votes
I would dearly love to put polygraph sensors on all the candidates in these debates to test them for validity.
I like this idea. In fact, lets require it every time they speak in an official capacity. Every campaign or policy speech. Wvery interview. Every townhall. etc....
- 5 votes
The woman he just recently denied even knowing, to include her voice or face, was seen talking to him very closely to at an event about a month ago. Keep on digging that hole deeper and deeper Cain. Now, he does have a decent singing voice so maybe he can get a job doing singing telegrams.
- 7 votes
For every bank I've robbed, there's thousands I haven't.
- 7 votes
Thanks for the post and all the humorous postings!! I laughed out loud when he said it. I'm sure the trolls will show up soon, so thank you all for brightening my day (in a sad sort of what is the world coming to way) - Hey at least I laughed!!!
- 3 votes
I'm a GOPer but I now doubt (perhaps prematurely) Herman Cain to the point my wife and I now think both Herman Cain and Rick Perry may not qualified to be nominated by the GOP - -
Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio may be the GOP ticket.
- 2 votes
You liberal need to realize that Clinton was not only accused of sexual harassment but also sexual assault. The accusations came from woman who were more creditable than the women accusing Cain. If you liberal followed the same rules of evidence then as you did now. Clinton was the first president that is openly known to have committed sexual assault.
- 1 vote
Here's the thing, with his comment calling Nancy Pelosi "Princess" during the debate, had Pelosi been an employee of his such a comment, clearly used in a demeaning manner could constitute sexual harassment.
By making the statement he only confirmed sexual harassment are probably more true than not. It also proves just how arrogant he is. Surely he didn't think he was helping his situation. Or is he going to claim once again, "it was a joke."
- 6 votes
The accusations came from woman who were more creditable than the women accusing Cain
what??? says YOU? LOLOLOL
Hey just b/c Clinton did it does not make it OK for Cain. Two wrongs NEVER make a right.
- 8 votes
If you liberal followed the same rules of evidence then as you did now
A woman from the past accuses a public figure of a past discretion..Clinton+Cain...check
A president lies about having a form of sex...Pres Clinton check
A presidential candidate changes his story several times on one day.....Cain check...giving the appearance if conservatives would follow his pattern of changing the story to suit his needs they should at a minimum have doubt in his credibility.
AnnForTruth01 great point although he proved his arrogance long ago he just keeps reinforcing it publically.
- 5 votes
But, CM, he does claim to be in to equal opportunity. But you are correct, thousands implies 2K+.
- 4 votes
Wow! From reading all these, the left is sooooooooo scared of Cain! LOL! You people will keep pushing these lies until you all look like complete fools. The truth about these women is already coming out and no amount of lying on your part will keep it from coming out. As usual, the left thinks if you say a LIE a 1,000+ times it miraculously comes true! You're all going to have egg on your face real soon. We already know the Bialek was fired for a false sexual harrassement charge with another company. She has numberous financial problems along with several law suits for non-payment. Gee, she's not doing this for money, is she? What fool doesn't realize that? You have to be a fool on a grand scale to think this woman only "wants to do what is right". Geez, she's not even a good liar. And the other one, the one that wants to get all the "gals" (sound like old home week or something) together so they can character assasinate Cain all together, sort of like a chorus of lying cackling hens. Well that one, actually works for the Obama Administration, but hell, she doesn't have an agenda either. She just wants to do what is right too.
You can make all the nasty, racist, ugly little jokes besmirching the good character of a good and decent man all you like. We know none of you are going to vote for him no matter what, so do you really think we care what any of you think? And please don't lecture me on character. Liberals wouldn't know good character if it jumped up and bit them on the ass.
- 1 vote
Clinton was the first president that is openly known to have committed sexual assault.
Bull@!$%#. Clinton never assaulted anyone - he didn't have to. Monica was miffed because he wouldn't have intercourse with her.
You can make all the nasty, racist, ugly little jokes besmirching the good character of a good and decent man all you like. We know none of you are going to vote for him no matter what
A lying misogynist? Interesting definition of good character you have there. This liberal was planning on voting for Cain in the primaries - I can't think of an easier win for Obama in 2012 than someone so clueless about any area of Presidential policy like Cain.
- 9 votes
The fact that you, as a woman, support this man is far more scary and truly sad.
I guess you believe women should submit to men and then toast them with a fine glass of good, Christian, Conservative lemonade?
Well you go then with the rest of your 'cast of (ahem, cough, cough) thousands'
As a Liberal, I did not support Bill Clinton during the whole Lewinsky mess. He had a consensual affair, not the first nor the last man to do so. His lying, yes, he needed to be impeached for it.
- 10 votes
So Deb would you be so defensive if this was Pres Obama? Would any conservatives for that matter I doubt it. So your generalization of Liberals not knowing good character applies equally with conservatives and liberatarians as well.
We obviously disagree with what is a good and decent man.
You can make all the nasty, racist, ugly little jokes besmirching the good character of a good and decent man all you like.
You know Deb I have made some comments about cain but were you upset with him when he said "blacks are too poor to be republican or blacks are brainwashed"? Did that offend you or do you agree with his statements?
- 7 votes
One? Where's the proof? Two? Raises eyebrows. Three? Ut oh. Four? holy crap. Five? Dude you have issues and the pattern is full, ghost rider. Pattern is full.
Women who are supporting him?
Yeah, talk about issues. Lack of self-respect and esteem.
- 9 votes
Godfather's "Herman Cain Pick-up/Carry-out Special" - Any Large Godfather's Pizza only 9-9-9 plus you can cop a feel off of the cashier on the way out.
- 6 votes
Like a cereal killer says "For every woman I killed, there are thousands of women I haven't killed!!"
(Jay Leno)
- 2 votes
You can make all the nasty, racist, ugly little jokes besmirching the good character of a good and decent man all you like.
When one runs as a Republican, would you mind letting everyone know?
- 17 votes
True DS. There's a difference between self-confident and arrogant. He's definitely the latter.
- 4 votes
HERE ya go herman... for every person that votes for cain, there are thousands that won't.for every newsvine supporter for cain. there are thousands of ones that don't, for every rightwing supporter of sexual harassers there are thousands that don't !
- 6 votes
Keep in mind that by and large, the blue states pay more to the feds than the red states, meaning red states need blue state money to survive.
Let's let the TEA GOP run on their record--the downgrading of the US credit rating, the climbing unemployment thanks to their obstructionism and churlishness.
You have no clue about economic "Cause and Effect". Lets just see how your liberal California experiment turns out! California will have its hand out for Taxpayer money very soon to keep its self dog paddling. As well as a good majority of other Blue States.
It doesnt matter anymore, the only thing we can agree on is to disagree. You go one way, we will be happy to go the other!
- 2 votes
Herman Cain is...off. When I watch him talk about these charges, I can't help thinking that there's something missing in him.
His team, his base, his brother by another mother are not going to let the Democratic machine take him down. His success as moral is a universally known fact says third person Herman Cain. C'mon Plants, everyone knows Herman Cain. Gosh :)
- 2 votes
It doesnt matter anymore, the only thing we can agree on is to disagree. You go one way, we will be happy to go the other!
When you say "we", are you referring to the far-right conservative minority? The majority of us don't think the way you do. Now what?
- 9 votes
Herman Cain is...off. When I watch him talk about these charges, I can't help thinking that there's something missing in him.
A brain? Heart? Common sense? Common decency? Couth? Class? Tact? Diplomacy? Presidential gravitas and bona fides? Honesty? Integrity? Respect? Intellectual curiosity? Humility? Self-awareness? Positive communication style that doesn't include the Third Person narcissistic, inflated sense of self and importance distancing attribute?
- 12 votes
You go one way, we will be happy to go the other!
I have a MUCH better idea, vettelover. We stay right where we are and YOU go away.
If representative government in a constitutionally-established democracy has become too much for you to handle, vettelover, you are more than welcome to find yourself another country. I for one am not going anywhere and will continue to view this ENTIRE country as MY country from sea to shining sea. You can't have any of it. If you expect to take some, then I expect you to be arrested, arraigned and tried for sedition. If found guilty, I expect for you to go to jail.
- 8 votes
GG I would only add personality. He is superficial and he is TOAST.
Good to see you, I always LOVE your posts!!
- 4 votes
While listening to National Public Radio in the car yesterday, I heard an amusing audio clip of Herman Cain, from the ABC/Yahoo News exclusive interview of November 8, 2011. This one is straight from the horse's mouth:
And so I happen to believe that they're tryin' to put en-- enough of this-- it's not even smoke. There's an old saying, if you throw enough mud up against the wall you hope that some of it will stick. And sooner or later, you'd have a muddy wall.
Yup.
- 3 votes
"For Every Person Who Says I Harassed Them, There Are ‘Thousands’ Who Say I Didn’t"
Seriously Herm... THAT's your defense? I'm loving this please do not stop.
- 5 votes
C'mon Plants, everyone knows Herman Cain. Gosh :)
Definitely...well, just maybe everyone knows Herman Cain...except Herman Cain, lol.
- 6 votes
I wanted my daughter to sue Bill Cosby for NOT being her father. That's how much sense Cain is making. He reminds me of an old boyfriend who told me he was a not as unfaithful as I believed. I told him it was physically impossible for him to be as unfaithful as I believed.
- 7 votes
CCArm! I almost added that but then I thought the issue is he has an abundance of "personality" it's just narcissistic.
Good to see you my friend....thank you and definitely back at you!
:)
- 5 votes
. Lets just see how your liberal California experiment turns out! California will have its hand out for Taxpayer money very soon to keep its self dog paddling. As well as a good majority of other Blue States.
Proof?
California pays for your red state nonsense. Without California's tax dollars, you'd resemble a third world country.
Red states are parasites.
You might want to read more about socialized countries, like the Netherlands...the people are very happy and don't lack any freedoms I can think of. Without conservatives standing in the way, California and other blue states would be paradise!
- 6 votes
The Jonesgirl said,
California and other blue states would be paradise!
I thought it already was! Especially Napa Valley! :-))
- 3 votes
California has been and always will be paradise in the best of times and the worst of times and every time in between, thank you.
Why do you think so many people from all over the world flock to visit and live?
- 3 votes
When he was in High School he was forced to read: "Catcher in the Thigh," by the Liberal Arts teacher, according to the RNC spokesperson.
- 1 vote
You mean like waterboarded forced?
Well if it's part of an established, state sanctioned curriculum and required reading.....there is nothing being forced upon if walking into a school a student knows they are bound by certain rules, regulations, boundaries, expectations, standards.
How dare a school want to educate anyone. The terror!
- 5 votes
For every ONE person accusing Cain of sexual harassment there a THOUSAND people who said he didn't for every MILLION people that couldn't care less as they have no intention for voting for Cain.
- 6 votes
MountainMike you almost sounded like Cain.....talking in the third person looking in.....got you though....LOL or maybe it was me reasoning to a cain level.
- 1 vote
Sad days for the GOP.
Diego: Respectfully you are in for a long and sobering night on November 6, 2012. Many signs point toward another GOP/TP victory including taking control of the Dem Senate.
~~~A primary reason Obama will likely lose in 2012 is Obamacare~~~
Respectfully you are in for a long and sobering night on November 6, 2012.
LOL..Send me Saturday nights lotto numbers while your at it...
If the GOP continues to run Candidates like McCain/Palin, it will continue to lose to ones like Obama/Biden.
The current candidates are bottom of the barrel. Not one deserves the office of President of the Greatest Country on Earth.IMHO. I may not like him, but I'll stick with the Devil I know.
I don't care much for the Dems, they are more then corrupt themselves, but the GOP??? They have lost the plot.. Auto-da-Fe'......it's the only way!
- 7 votes
I am not nearly as sanguine about the President's/democrats' chances in 2012. I look at the fact that McCain ran the worst presidential campaign since Michael Dukakis. He picked the stupidest vice presidential nominee since Dan Quayle. His party's policies brought the entire world to the precipice of financial armaggeddon and ushered in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. The incumbent republican president failed to protect the nation from terrorist attack and lies us into the invasion of a country that did not attack us at the cost of thousands of American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars. The incumbent Administration trashed the concept of shared sacrifice, sending soldiers to fight for oil while implementing tax cuts for those who didn't need them. In spite of all of this, 60 million of our fellow Americans voted for John McCain. If that many people could be so galactically stupid that they endorse with their votes the clearest case of abject fecklessness in government in generations, I don't count on them wise-ing up now to reject the people who continue to advocate the policies that got us into this mess in the first place.
Don't get it twisted. The 2012 campaign will be war. And in spite of isolated and temporary victories against conservative overreach, progressives are whistling past the graveyard if they aren't looking for a path to 72 million votes in 2012, particularly when republicans in every battleground state are engaged in blatant efforts to suppress votes and disenfranchise voters.
- 5 votes
Definitely...well, just maybe everyone knows Herman Cain...except Herman Cain, lol.
True. othering... other's is toxic to ones own sense of self. Sad.
Have good day, Plants :)
- 2 votes
jmorris re your quote below:
So are these "signs from God" or the misspelled teabagger-type signs?
jmorris: Here are some signs you asked about that Obama may not be re-elected and why his ratings have dropped 30% since he was sworn in:
If you are looking for reason’s O’s approval has dropped 30% since he was sworn in here’s a few from the GOP perspective: Rampant statements that failed to materialize, failed policies, the O administration said that if their first stimulus was passed unemployment would not exceed 8%; it's now at 9%, an apparent class warfare strategy by O, colossal deficits: In 32 months O's annual deficits totaled $3.7 billion; conversely Bush's total deficits for 8 years was $2.7 billion. And especially in Florida O’s suggestion that the Israelis and Palestinians resort to the 1967 borders when beginning negotiations!
Evidence that Obama is out of touch with Congress is that his budget was defeated 97-0 in the Democrat controlled Senate.
~ ~ O's primary problem with JOBS and the election is Obamacare ~ ~
What is this? Libatopia?
Well the libs need to go back to Libya. With that being said, which is more true.
Dr. Manning PHD says Obama scored cocaine for his previous lover Larry Sinclair.
Or some blonde saying in 1998 she met Cain, he was wearing a suit, and had no tie, and his shirt was unbuttoned. sure this was'nt the 70s Then he put one hand on her thigh, then one on her head. then she says she was trying to figure out what he was doing. Sounds fishy and must of smelled fishy.
Hope this helps
back to my Tall Iced Tea & Stogey
- 3 votes
republicans in every battleground state are engaged in blatant efforts to suppress votes and disenfranchise voters.
Both sides play dirty dwillie. But O's failed policies, statements that he didn't fulfill, 9% unemployment and ~ ~ ~Obamacare~ ~ ~ will likely rule the day on Nov. 6, 2012.
.
- 2 votes
ecagetx
Thanks. The libs sure can be funny, their make-em ups crack me up, and they make good one night stands.
back to My Tall Iced Tea & Stogey
- 3 votes
Regarding the complete nonsense above in #1.100 about the ARRA stimulus and the unemployment rate, I'm reposting what actually occurred with regard to the ARRA stimulus and the unemployment rate:
If you'll recall, during Bush's last few months in office and into President Obama's first months in office, the US economy was in economic freefall due to Bush's Great Recession being at its worst point. As a result, anyone with a brain in his/her head knew that the federal government was going to need to put forth a stimulus plan to counter this economic freefall.
After the 2008 election, Obama was preparing to take over as President. In December of 2008, one of Obama's advisers mentioned trying to do stimulus back and said that a stimulus might be able to keep unemployment from going over 8%. On January 9, 2009, before Obama took office, Obama's advisers released "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan". The report indicated that doing the stimulus was expected to keep unemployment from going over 8%.
This report EXPRESSLY stated: "It should be understood that all of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant margins of error. There is the more fundamental uncertainty that comes with any estimate of the effects of a program. Our estimates of economic relationships and rules of thumb are derived from historical experience and so will not apply exactly in any given episode. Furthermore, the uncertainty is surely higher than normal now because the current recession is unusual both in its fundamental causes and its severity." Further, the report stated: "Forecasts of the unemployment rate without the recovery plan vary substantially. Some private forecasters anticipate unemployment rates as high as 11 percent in the absence of action."
When this report was released on January 9, 2009, the extent of the economic damage resulting from Bush's Great Recession was still unknown, and actually would not be fully known until over 2 years later in mid 2011. Further, the economic freefall during this time of Bush's Great Recession certainly made things more difficult to predict. The information Obama had at the time of the report was that the unemployment rate for November 2008 was 6.7%, up from 6.5%, and 533,000 jobs were lost in November 2008. The December 2008 unemployment numbers and jobs losses would not be out until the end the January 2009, and were not known to Obama at the beginning of January 2009 when the report was issued. Further, the 4th Quarter economic numbers relating to US GDP and other indicators were not available to Obama at that time either. As we later found out (about 2 1/2 years later), the US economy in the 4th Quarter of 2008 had been severely contracting with GDP being –8.9% (!!!) and, in the 1st Quarter of 2009, the US economy had contracted greatly with GDP being –6.7%!!! This was the worst economic contraction in many many decades!!!
Further, after the report was issued, Obama only later finds out that the unemployment rate had started spiking badly in December 2009, with the unemployment rate jumping to 7.3% and 632,000 jobs lost!!! It got even worse in January 2009, as the unemployment rate spiked further to 7.8% and 741,000 jobs were lost(!!!), just as Bush was leaving office and Obama was coming into office.
Part of the reason that Obama had the report issued even before he was in office was so that the stimulus plan could be acted on immediately after he was sworn in to office. Further, prior to being sworn in, Obama and his advisers were already working with members of Congress on the stimulus plan so it would be ready to go when Obama was sworn in. HOWEVER, thanks to resistance to doing stimulus by the republicans and a few conservative democrats, the stimulus plan was held up in Congress for another month after Obama was sworn in to office. As a result, the ARRA stimulus was not passed until mid-February 2009. By this time (as the employment data later showed), the February 2009 unemployment rate was already OVER 8%, at 8.2%, and 681,000 jobs were lost!!! In March 2009, just as the ARRA stimulus was getting underway, the unemployment rate already had jumped up to 8.6% and there were 652,000 jobs lost!!!
So it would be pretty F#@KING hard for the ARRA stimulus to keep unemployment below 8% when, by the time the ARRA stimulus was finally passed and was just starting to be implemented, the unemployment rate was already 8.6% and still trending towards going significantly higher.
Based on the relatively limited economic data Obama and his advisers had at the time in December 2008 and early January 2009 (e.g., November 2008 unemployment was 6.7%), one could hardly blame them for making an optimistic estimate that the stimulus might be able to keep unemployment from going over 8% (again noting that they said there was the potential for a significant margin for error in their estimates due in part to Bush's Great Recession being "unusual both in its fundamental causes and its severity").
However, with all of that said, the ARRA stimulus still did very well and created or saved MILLIONS of jobs. This in spite of the fact that, as many economists stated, the ARRA stimulus package should have been much larger than $787 billion. The ARRA stimulus and other Obama policies were able to stem the economic freefall of Bush's Great Recession to stop the monthly job losses of 500,000 – 740,000 per month, and to end Bush's Great Recession by the end of June 2009.
Four non-partisan studies have shown that the stimulus created or saved millions of jobs (as compared to what would have happened had the ARRA stimulus not been done).
- CBO: (as compared to what would have happened had the ARRA stimulus not been done) between 1.2 million and 3.3 million jobs saved or created by the stimulus;
---- the stimulus raised real (inflation-adjusted) GDP by between 1.1% and
3.1%;
---- the stimulus lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.6 percentage points and 1.8 percentage points; and
---- the stimulus increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 1.6 million to 4.6 million.
- IHS/Global Insight: 2.45 million jobs saved or created (as compared to what would have happened had the ARRA stimulus not been done).
- Macroeconomic Advisers: 2.3 million jobs saved or created (as compared to what would have happened had the ARRA stimulus not been done).
- Moody's Economy.com: 2.5 million jobs saved or created (as compared to what would have happened had the ARRA stimulus not been done).
Further, the President's Council of Economic Advisors estimated that between 2.5 and 3.6 million jobs were created or saved by the stimulus.
IN SUM: The ARRA stimulus LARGELY did what it was intended to do and was very successful. The only issue with it was that, given that the scope of the problem the US was facing due to Bush's Great Recession was very large (and actually was much larger than they knew at the time), the ARRA stimulus should have been MUCH LARGER than it was.
- 7 votes
Regarding the COMPLETE FALSEHOOD that Bush's total deficits for 8 years was only $2.7 billion -- ($2.7 BILLION - REALLY???!!!)
DATA SOURCE: U.S. TREASURY
BUSH DEFICITS BY YEAR
FISCAL YEAR ------------------------ FEDERAL DEFICIT
FY 2002 (October 2001 - Sept. 2002) --- $ 409.3 billion
FY 2003 (October 2002 - Sept. 2003) --- $ 589.1 billion
FY 2004 (October 2003 - Sept. 2004) --- $ 605.0 billion
FY 2005 (October 2004 - Sept. 2005) --- $ 523.2 billion
FY 2006 (October 2005 - Sept. 2006) --- $ 574.3 billion
FY 2007 (October 2006 - Sept. 2007) --- $ 555.6 billion
FY 2008 (October 2007 - Sept. 2008) --- $ 1.062 TRILLION
FY 2009 (October 2008 - Sept. 2009) --- $ 1.796 TRILLION
TOTAL BUSH DEFICITS: ------------- $ 6.114 TRILLION
- 9 votes
IFeelSo... if I could vote those up a gazillion times... I would... BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 7 votes
Both sides play dirty dwillie
Bull$hit ecagetx.
Republicans have elevated voter disenfranchisement and suppression to a high art form, something republican operatives themselves admit.
Just like in Florida in 2000, the only way republicans can win is by limiting the number of voters.
- 6 votes
O's suggestion that the Israelis and Palestinians resort to the 1967 borders when beginning negotiations!
Yet another falsehood from #1.100.
What President Obama actually stated is that the basis of the negotiations is clear: "a viable Palestine, a secure Israel. ... [T]he borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."
This is the SAME Israeli-Palestinian policy that the US has had for decades!!!
- 4 votes
Sounds fishy and must of smelled fishy.
Your ignorant ugly rhetoric finally got you on my ignore list.
- 4 votes
IFeel I suspect what you have done is mistakenly used national debt rather than the yearly deficit (Shortfall for a particular year) - The annual deficit is the shortfall in spending vs. revenue for a particular year. The national debt is the sum total for all US obligations for all Presidents past, present and future obligations as well – The two are vastly different. Your $6.1 trillion figure is likely because you accidently used national debt increases over 8 yrs as opposed to the annual deficit (Shortfall) totals for 8 years.
*******************************************
Therefore IFeel if you intended to reflect Bush’s total annual deficits (shortfalls) for 8 yrs as $6.1 trillion, your figure is incorrect.
*******************************************
Respectfully IFeel: Re Obama's suggestion that the Israelis and Palestinians resort to the 1967 borders when beginning negotiations your claim was:
This is the SAME Israeli-Palestinian policy that the US has had for decades!!!
IFeel with all due respect you are mistaken - FACT: The US has had no such official policy for decades.
.
**************************************
If you doubt that why not post this official US policy we've supposedly had for decades? (It doesn't exist.)
**************************************
@ecagetx -
We've gone through this before regarding the federal deficits. My numbers ARE CORRECT, you just continue to choose to ignore them. You either wholly lack understanding in how to calculate deficits and debt, or you are willfully being ignorant.
RE: Israeli-Palestinian policy
Bush (2005): "Any final status agreement must be reached between the two parties, and changes to the 1949 Armistice lines must be mutually agreed to.
A viable two-state solution must ensure contiguity of the West Bank, and a state of scattered territories will not work. There must also be meaningful linkages between the West Bank and Gaza. This is the position of the United States today, it will be the position of the United States at the time of final status negotiations."
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050526.html
That is saying the same thing as Obama said, as the 1967 borders prior to the 6-day war were the 1949 Armistice lines. Here, Bush is saying return to the 1967 borders prior to the 6-day war with mutually agreed land swaps to provide "meaningful linkages between the West Bank and Gaza." Bush also was calling for "a viable two-state solution."
President Clinton: The Clinton administration negotiated with Then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak who signed a document "understanding that the negotiations on the Permanent Status will lead to the implementation of Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338." UNSR 242, passed in November 1967, calls for the "withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict." That recent conflict being, of course, the 6-day war.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/un242.asp
The too is equivalent to what President Obama said.
Nixon (1969-1970): Nixon's Secretary of State William Rogers set forth the Rogers Plan to try to end the War of Attrition and negotiate a plan to implement UN Security Council Resolution 242, which, as stated before, was passed in November 1967 and calls for the "withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict." The recent conflict being the 6-day war.
In December of 1969, US Secretary Of State Rogers stated: "We agreed that the major Powers - the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France - should cooperate to assist the Secretary-General's representative, Ambassador Jarring, in working out a settlement in accordance with the Resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations of November 1967. ...
[W]e were clear that the only framework for a negotiated settlement was one in accordance with the entire text of the UN Security Council Resolution. That Resolution was agreed upon after long and arduous negotiations; it is carefully balanced; it provides the basis for a just and lasting peace - a final settlement - not merely an interlude between wars. ...
Therefore, our policy is to encourage the Arabs to accept a permanent peace based on a binding agreement and to urge the Israelis to withdraw from occupied territory when their territorial integrity is assured as envisaged by the Security Council Resolution.
Withdrawal and territory: - the Security Council Resolution endorses the principle of the non-acquisition of territory by war and calls for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the 1967 war. We support this part of the Resolution, including withdrawal, just as we do its other elements.
The boundaries from which the 1967 war began were established in the 1949 Armistice Agreements and have defined the areas of national jurisdiction in the Middle East for 20 years. The Security Council Resolution neither endorses nor-precludes these armistice lines as the definitive political boundaries. However, it calls for withdrawal from occupied territories, the non-acquisition of territory by war, and for the establishment of secure and recognized boundaries. We believe that while recognized political boundaries must be established, and agreed upon by the parties, any change in the pre-existing lines should not reflect the weight of conquest and should be confined to insubstantial alterations required for mutual security. We do not support expansionism. We believe troops must be withdrawn as the Resolution provides."
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign+Relations/Israels+Foreign+Relations+since+1947/1947-1974/9+Statement+by+Secretary+of+State+Rogers-+9+Decemb.htm
That resolution referenced by Rogers being, of course, UN Security Council Resolution 242.
Rogers' statements are calling for withdrawal of Israel from lands occupied by Israel during the 6-day war, and is also saying that the the Israelis and Palestinians can work towards mutually agreed changes to the pre-existing lines (that is, they can make mutually agreed land swaps).
Presidents Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr. never retreated from the aforementioned policies, and the UN Security Council Resolution 242 remained in force with support of the US.
During his administration, President Carter pushed for a Palestinian homeland.
Reagan stated with regard to Resolution 242: "There is, however, another way to peace. The final status of these lands must, of course, be reached through the give-and-take of negotiations; but it is the firm view of the United States that self-government by the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza in association with Jordan offers the best chance for a durable, just and lasting peace."
It is the United States' position that - in return for peace - the withdrawal provision of Resolution 242 applies to all fronts, including the West Bank and Gaza." Thus, Reagan was saying return to 1967 borders with "give-and-take" negotiations on the final status of lands (that is, mutually negotiated and agreed to land swaps).
When Bush Sr. was in office, in a press conference on March 3, 1990, Bush Sr. stated that east Jerusalem was occupied territory and NOT a sovereign part of Israel as the Israelis claimed. Thus, Bush Sr. was stating that Israel was occupying lands it took during the 6-day war and the US did NOT recognize those occupied lands as being part of Israel.
- 5 votes
Actually, technically, with regard to Clinton, implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 242 would go further than what Obama or Bush was calling for with regard to Israel leaving occupied lands, however, it was clear that, like the other Presidents, Clinton was only advocating enforcement of Resolution 242 with negotiated agreements on any land swaps.
- 4 votes
Sorry IFeel, with all due respect you used national debt increases rather than annual deficit increases.
FACT: The national debt is the sum total for all US obligations for all Presidents past, present and future obligations as well – The two are vastly different. Your $6.1 trillion figure is likely because you mistakenly used national debt increases over 8 yrs as opposed to the annual deficit (Shortfall) totals for 8 years.
FACT: The annual deficit is the shortfall in spending vs. revenue for a particular year.
IFeel: You will discover (No disrespect intended) you recklessly posted national debt increases over 8 yrs rather than Bush’s annual deficit SHORTFALL(S) over an 8 year period.
- 2 votes
IFeel RE: "Obama's suggestion that Israel and the Palestinians go back to 1967 borders to begin negotiations" here’s your comment:
This is the SAME Israeli-Palestinian policy that the US has had for decades!!! (1.110)
IFeel very respectfully there is no such US official position for decades.* I can post sites like this:
Please Google: "Obama alters U.S. policy, tells Israel to start with ‘67 borders"
.and
New further evidence: http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/05/19/obama_alters_us_policy_tells_israel_to_start_with_67_borders .
"Former Congressman Robert Wexler, now the president of the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace, told The Cable that Obama's announcement was a bold step toward Middle East peace that alters U.S. policy in a fundamental way."
. …But what it all comes down to is my challenge to post THE US official position for decades. No such official postion exists - (IFeel, it simply does not exist.)
***************************
*Perhaps you would like to try again to cut&paste THE "US official position" you referred to. Not trying to be antagonistic IFeel, but I think you’ll find there was no such “US official position” as you incorrectly assert.
***************************
- 2 votes
So is his point supposed to be then that it makes the few that have a tiny percentage and that makes it ok? Lol. George errrr, Herman is getting upset!
- 21 votes
Yeah, these women are interfering with his BOOK SIGNING tour; They are messing with his get dummy's money scheme. "You betcha"...
With the Cains,Palins,Newts etc...The Presidency does not pay enough. It's all about more money, more money, more money- more me me me ...
- 21 votes
cue republican voter applause.
- 25 votes
This is hilarious. He must be taking speaking lessons from Bachmann.
- 25 votes
He must be taking speaking lessons from Bachmann
And denial lessons from Bill Clinton.
Logic lessons from Palin, speaking lessons from Bachmann, ideological lessons from Newt, cult lessons from all the rest, and Huntsman he ignores.
You stupid despicable lying republican pew sickened bastard.
- 5 votes
Cain is now an official "80/20 candidate":
80% of his votes will come from 20% of the voters, and I am just fine with that. I wholeheartedly hope he wins the G.O.P. nomination.
Since that has a snowball's chance in hell of happening, he should just resign, if he has any decency left in the body he can't control.
- 6 votes
I have know or know 1,000s of people as well..... and most think I am a good guy. But even I will admit if I were to run for President there would be a few say I am not the kind gentle man I believe myself to be. I have patted my share of cute butts and made obscene offers to a few... but none that worked for me, nor have I ever paid anyone off.
I wonder how many I's ... I can fit into one long run on sentence.
Maybe I need to start talking about myself in the third person.... Brite I have wondered the same.
- 15 votes
Good on you for admitting it up front. Now that it's out in the open you can run for president with a clean slate :)
- 10 votes
For every seven persons the Manson family killed, there are millions of others they didn't.
- 25 votes
Gotta love the twisted logic there. Because there are thousands of women who haven't accused him of sexual harassment, obviously he's innocent?
Gosh for all the kids that have called me "Mom" over the years, (both my own and their friends), there are millions that haven't. Called me "mom" that is.
Still doesn't make me a virgin.
*LOL*
- 22 votes
Pretty much the same her, daMamma. When my kids were growing up I was called Mom by not only my own kids, but, by their friends, teachers and just about everyone they associated with. Even when they got older and had their own jobs, the people they worked with called me Mom most of the time too. When I became a grandmother, the grandkids, their friends and their parents, teachers and just about everyone else calls me "Grandma." Yet, there are millions of people out there who never called me Mom or Grandma.
So....what does that mean? What does it prove? That they don't know me, never were around me, preferred to address me in a more formal manner?
So Cain's comparison is really nothing but empty lip service to the morons who don't care if he sexually harassed or assaulted women anyway.
I guess he must think that all the American people are as braindead as those who don't care anyway.
I have to wonder though, where is their moral indignation, their oh so religious piety that it does not matter to them if he messed around on his wife with other women. I guess they figure that if he says his wife believes him, which we only have his word for, then why should they be at all concerned. However, if it were a Democrat they would want him tarred and feathered and quartered, like they did Anthony Weiner, who was never in physical contact with any of the women he was accused of sending sexy pics of his body to.
He is just playing the game to drum up more trash for another book about Herman Cain that he'll likely write after he drops out of the running, which I expect to be fairly soon. Or, he may already be working on it so that he can get it printed sooner, that way he can beat Bachmann to the money train as she is likely to stay in the running, even after the final nomination which she will lose.
Cain is nothing but a male Sarah Palin. But, look how much money she's made off the game, and she's still playing it, just using a different desk of cards.
- 8 votes
He once stated that his wife did come out on the campaign trail with him as she stayed at home and kept the sanity of their home going.
At this point I would tend to believe he did want to have her out on the campaign trail with him as she would cramp his style with inviting other women to private dinners and upgrading their hotel rooms to Palatial Suites for them thinking he had bought and/or paid for the right to sexually assault or harass them and get a BJ.
The more that comes out, the less believable he becomes, and I don't think his wife is truly that naive or trusting. But, she may 'stand by' Her-man no matter what as a dutiful, Christian, Southern woman who knows her place.
- 4 votes
Correction to my above post...
"He once stated that his wife did come out on the campaign trail with him"
Should read - "He once stated that his wife didn't come out on the campaign trail with him..."
- 3 votes
"For every rich person that's going to make out like a bandit and pay far less taxes under my 9-9-9 tax plan, there are thousands of working class people who won't pay less taxes and actually will pay more taxes."
- 37 votes
"For every person who will get killed by the electrified fence I want to put up at the US-Mexican border, there are probably thousands who won't be killed."
- 34 votes
Wow, thats rather rude. Reported as such.
You are making me laugh. How can I be rude for calling someone who callse themself "IFellSoCheapAndDirty", "Cheap and Dirty?
- 2 votes
Hetep and Respect IfeelSoCheapAndDirty, what does your handle mean?
He once again is talking non-sense. A serial child molester could say for everyone I molested there are a thousand I did not molest.
Cain the professional lobbyist, is a disgrace and should leave the race.
Cain and Perry are symbols that the Republican party is finished in America.
Elect NO Republican for 100 Years
- 18 votes
Because you said it in reply directly to a comment of theirs that you did not agree with, that makes it an insult.
If I misunderstood the underlying tone based on your other posts then I apologize. Maybe you need to consider how your comments come across.
- 4 votes
I said it because the handle left the door wide open. I couldn't help myself. Call me flawed...I don't care.
- 1 vote
This site is so juvenile sometimes..."I'm telling on you!" Adults I know take care of themselves...sheesh.
In reference to Cain...he's so done. For every politician I've seen this year, there are thousands of non-politicians who could do a better job.
- 2 votes
For every teabag loony angerly posting here with lips twisted from sour grapes, there are thousands of more reasonable people that aren't.
- 10 votes
Cain the professional lobbyist, is a disgrace and should leave the race.
Agreed. He should leave the race. The HUMAN race...
- 7 votes
Sounds a lot like tiger. "could have harassed/humped more women, but didn't"
- 8 votes
Except for Tiger Woods it was "could have slept with even more women that wanted me but I didn't". For Cain it was "could have harassed more women trying to force them to sleep with me but I didn't"
- 11 votes
And Tiger is somewhat attractive. Cain could pose for a totem pole. (Waiting for somebody to suggest he represent King Likkmydikkie.)
- 8 votes
@WoodieRae - AWESOME!! Or better yet, King Likkymedikkie Stan Stan
- 3 votes
What a defense for the accused at a trial ...
Hey Judge, for every woman that I (allegedly) assaulted, there are thousands that I didn't harm, so I'm not such a bad guy, right?
- 20 votes
I'm just waiting for the cartoon tomorrow.
First panel Herman saying for every person who has accused him of sexual harassment, there are probably thousands who haven't.
Second panel Herman again with pimp hat and gold tooth glint saying "But don't worry ladies, I'll get to you."
- 22 votes
in that double-breasted suit and ranger hat, he does look like a stereotypical pimp.
- 11 votes
Stewart, and Colbert are going to have a field day with old herm on this.
- 15 votes
Sperman Cain, earning his nickname one assault at a time...
- 12 votes
T-800 - I look forward to Jon and Stephen's takes on all the insanity of the gop/teaparty shenanigans.
Cain and all the teaparty candidates have given them volumes and volumes of material!
- 4 votes
When people believe accusations with out a verdict they are doing it because they want the accusations to be true. They are hoping Cain has been what some, who don't have the facts, say he is because they, for some reason, hope he fails.
When people disbelieve accusations with out cosidering the evidence or possibility they're true they are doing it because they want the accusations to be untrue. They are hoping Cain is no less than what he says he is because they, because he's a Republican, hope he succeeds.
- 13 votes
There are a couple of Republican candidates I could support. Cain is being dealt what appears to be an injustice. That is what bothers me and nothing else.
- 2 votes
Clint, if Perry got the nomination, and you found out that Perry WAS behind the outing of these sexual harassment cases as Cain believes, would you still vote for Perry?
- 8 votes
Herman needs to take a Herman break.
I've never met the man and can therefore accurately state that he never sexually harassed me. He's got solid funding and backing from the Kochs to make his primary runs. His 'thousands' comment is cocky because he's got the bank roll.
What is injustice concerning Herman is the manner in which he references the sexual harassment settlements that are not allegations. For clarity: the actual settlements are not allegations. The actions giving rise to the settlements may or may not be allegations. Those settlements are on his resume. Surely, at the outset, he could have defused the reality of the settlements without the lack of memory tactic, or the suddenly remembering some aspects tactic, or any of the tactics that he is constantly using like the 'thousands' comment.
Folks say that Herman isn't being harmed in the polls. The only polls I care about at this point are the primary results. If the teflon covered Herman can win in the primaries and become the teapublican candidate for president, then it's going to be a bumpy general election campaign season, America!
- 8 votes
bonos...is that inferring that Perry falsified the relase..that is was made up? Apparently the accusaitons weren't made up since Cain lied about it when it came to light.
Think back to the 2004 and 2008 campaigns...thr eis NEVER a presidential nomination field where skeletons arne't dug up..it happens every single time. Politics is a dirty game, ESPECIALLY when it comes to seeking the nomination. Think back to the nomination run in 2008. The Clinton camp was far from "friendly" to then Sen Obama's campaign.
Mudslnging is the norm but in any case, I would certainly like to know if a potential president has sexually harrassed people and been called on the carpet for it. After all, isn't tha tthe same person who would be signing laws into effect on that same type of subject...talk about hypocrisy.
- 4 votes
No, Lynn, I'm not inferring that perry made anything up. I'm just repeating Cain's assertion that he thinks that Perry was being the outing of the existence of the claims.
I'd like to know if people who are incensed that the harassment claims came to light would still vote for Perry if he was found to have been behind it.
- 8 votes
Of course they will, bonos- they may not admit it here (see lack of response from your original inquiry) but you and I know very well they will vote for whomever has a (R).
- 4 votes
bonos rama
Haven't you notice how much clearer and brighter Mitt 'Mixed-up Mis-matched Mismash' Romney's smile is? Not to say he is responsible for Herman Cain's woes, but I am willing to bet that he knew about it before it was ever made public. He had the gall to say, live and in living color, that public service employees make more money than he does. Such a comment from that millionaire is outrageous arrogance magnified, and downright confident that he will get the nomination.
At first Herman Cain said the media was trying to do a 'poor me-Clarence Thomas high-tech lynching' of his character, then he blamed Rick Perry. His next trick that he pulled out of that pimp hat was that some Democratic Machine was out to destroy his character. What will he do when his accusers mass together and have that much-hoped for news conference which will nip his crap in the bud.
After watching Rick Perry 'ricky ticky tavi' during his whacked out appearance before that audience in New Hampshire, then witnessing that memory loss on that debate last night, the Republican party, nationwide, has got to suppress the vote and do everything they can to even have a viable candidate to challenge the President.
I haven't even mentioned the rest of the low-scoring candidates. That would surely litter this seed with crapola out the wazoo.
Every single one of them have proven, just by their own statements and actions, that if they are the best that the Republican voters have to offer, then for the rightwing it should be embarrassing to have to support either one of them. I doubt if it will matter to them.......which one of these inept and apparently unqualified people get the nomination.
Who knows what will happen next, but in 2012, if the election goes to President Obama, maybe the Supreme Court will step in and just give it to whoever that Republican will be.
Carl Rove must be having night terrors and waking up in a cold sweat.
- 4 votes
wjm5-0 wrote:
After watching Rick Perry 'ricky ticky tavi' during his whacked out appearance before that audience in New Hampshire, then witnessing that memory loss on that debate last night,
There's a joke about a teleprompter in there someplace. :)
Seriously, Perry's intellectual capacity is strained just trying to remember his scripted responses. I can't even imagine the meltdown he'd have if he had to actually support his positions.
- 7 votes
Have you seen the tape of how Illinois's Republican Sen. Joe Walsh lost his cool during a breakfast conference with his own constituents?
He cussed, got in people's faces and pointed his finger (probably let a little spittle fly), slammed his fist on tables, stomped his foot, hollered at the top of his lungs, and even threatened to have people thrown out when they questioned his policies.
He even claimed he was thrown off balance by hunger....while having that meeting in a restuarant, for God's sake!!!
The Republicans really need to step up that effort to suppress the vote, nationwide.....
Their anti-middleclass agendas and even the hate they have stirred up at the President doesn't appear to be working as well as they thought.
I can see where they are finding it hard to believe that even their own voters would have problems accepting what they are offering to get re-elected, or even get Pres. Obama out of the White House, especially with the Republican candidates falling all over themselves and looking like clowns to the general public.
They seem to suspect that the 2012 elections aren't going to a good time for them, as an electable party.
- 4 votes
Someone get this guy the 'A complete idiot's guide to handling political scandals' book! Or if there isn't one, they should write it. Hell, it would write itself.
Chapter 1. Do not do what Herman Cain did
Chapter 2. Do not do what Herman Cain did
Chapter 3. Do not do what Herman Cain did
Oh look they DO have one - http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Government-Politics/dp/1592578535
I may just donate to the Herman Cain campaign after all...I did send this one to the Bush white house.
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Middle-Conflict/dp/0028632613
I'm so generous...*LOL*
- 21 votes
I did send this one to the Bush white house.
YIKES Student! Did you get an all expenses paid trip to the resort down in Guantanamo Bay, courtesy of cheney, for that?
- 6 votes
Clint... There is some truth to your post. If one dislikes Cain and feels he is incompetent to serve as President, then accusations have more of a chance of seeming true. However, it is that the women who accused him were given settlements, and more women are coming out of the bush. If Cain would have told the truth, I would, at least, respect him for it. He lied. As such, there is nothing left to respect.
- 24 votes
Really ? Would you give Obama or another Democrat such a pass ? I should pull up your comments on Anthony Weiner's articles from the archive and paint your hypocrisy in bright red for all to see.
"There was no settlement."
"There might have been a settlement, but I hope it wasn't for much, because I didn't do anything."
"I made a gesture comparing one of the woman's heights to that of my wife and it was taken the wrong way. As a result, the NRA offered that woman 3 months salary as a severance package."
"The woman who made these accusations against me I've never even met."
All of those were lies. Either by omission, or deception, or malfeasance.
Let me break this down shotgun style for you.
Cain lied about there being a settlement at all, (a businessman that doesn't even know what the definition of a settlement is ?) , Cain lied about the amount of the settlement, Cain lied about the terms which the employees left, and Cain lied about even knowing these women.
You go out of your way to take everything Obama says and does out of context and twist it to fit your political agenda (If you'd like, I'll use your post history to emphasize my point) and yet you bend over backwards to defend someone who thinks so little of you that he refuses to admit he made a human error.
Newsflash: If Cain had said "I was involved in work-related instances with female workers where I conducted myself in a less than professional manner. As a result these women complained to the National Restaurant Association about my conduct. These women were offered reasonable settlements and allowed to leave the National Restaurant Association with a favorable letter of dismissal because of these accusations. I apologize for my conduct at this time, it was wrong of me to do so and I have learned from my mistakes and sought forgiveness from both my wife and God for my actions. I hope that you'll accept the fact that I made a mistake as a man, and I've done my best to accept responsibility for my actions. I'm sorry for any loss of trust this might have caused and I hope you too can forgive me."
It would've been out of the media in 2 days at most. The most recent accusers likely would've never come forward, because he would've accepted responsibility for his actions. Instead, he slandered some women who used to work for him. (Also, a lie. There are no records of them being disciplined while at work or receiving official reprimands)
No one really cares about the fact that he sexually harassed women. Some do, but most - not so much.
What they care about is the fact that he trusts the American people SO little, that he feels it necessary to lie about what he calls 'meaningless' accusations. Spin it out however you want, he has not been forthright in his answers.
Which begs this question, if he'll lie to the people about something trivial , what will he lie about when it's important?
Do you know why perjury is an impeachable offense? The answer is that perjury damages the integrity of not only the officeholder, but the office itself.
The Marine Corps has a definition on integrity - it's applicable here.
Integrity: Doing the right thing for the right reasons, not because someone is looking, but simply because it is the right thing to do.
- 31 votes
Clint, this is not a legal case. Mr. Cain has failed the common sense sniff test. IF he thinks he can win, he has the right to take these women to court for slander. You want to guess why he hasn't? Uh, probably because he did it.... After all, he says he will take a polygraph test, but only if he's compelled to do so.... Please, Clint, take the tinfoil off your head. It's not helping you and it only makes your support of Cain look even dumber than Cain.
- 15 votes
He can't take them to court because he is running for President and that leaves him open to these accusations without legal recourse. It is up to individuals to afford him a conviction before they sentence him.
This is politics as it's played today.
He is guilty of the greatest sin in elections and that's becoming a punchline for jokes. There's not many politicians that can survive that and most that did had at least a level of competence well beyond Mr. Cain.
- 10 votes
No Clint, he can't take them to court because as soon as the judge reads that a settlement was paid, the case will be thrown out.
That and the defense would be able to subpoena the NRA's documents regarding to the settlement, and the non-disclosure agreement would be lifted for the trial.
None of this Cain wants.
- 17 votes
It really doesn't matter. Cain is holding his own in the poles and his rise in popularity has been steady all through this tempest in a teapot. And it doesn't matter a whole lot to me, except that I don't like seeing injustice, because I haven't decided who I will vote for yet.
You're right, Clint: Cain will be holding his own pole for the rest of his life.
His campaign, however, is over.
- 13 votes
Cain is holding his own in the poles and his rise in popularity has been steady all through this tempest in a teapot.
Literally? He must be tired from holding on to those POLES, huh?
- 5 votes
I know, you couldn't help yourself.
Yes, it was just too easy. But evidently, Cain couldn't help himself either. ;-)
Cain is not holding his own in the polls, either:
The poll from Reuters/Ipsos found that 57 percent of Republican voters view Cain favorably, a drop from 66 percent a week ago, before claims of sexual harassment surfaced from when Cain was president of the National Restaurant Association.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/192057-poll-cains-support-drops-after-harassment-allegations-surface
- 11 votes
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html
I like this one because I don't get tempted to use the poll that supports my position.
if on the first two he hadnt started off with
first, denying knowledge
second, shifting to well, I think I know about it but I dont know
third, ya ok, I knew, I even will tell you fully about it, but it was nothing really
then this wouldnt have become what it has
and that was BEFORE the next three women showed up making similar claims
- 12 votes
Clint, the RCP link you gave shows the average of Cain's numbers in many polls over the past two weeks.
The point of my link was to show the difference between where Cain stood last week, before the harassment allegations were well-known, and where he is now that people know about them.
We'll see where he is next week.
- 9 votes
I see your point and next week will be interesting, Beau.
- 3 votes
I agree to 11.3 way up there (though I don't know, as you get votes and move up, do your comment numbers change) anyhoo.
If he had admitted it up front and gave the speech Student of Life wrote, I'd have been fine with it.
And the fact that the more women that speak out brings him more donations - what does that say about his supporters!
And he can't pronounce 'with'. That drives me crazy.
- 2 votes
He can't pronounce with.
It's "wif"......and just wait....I am sure ask as "axe" is on it's way as is "I'm fixin' to". He's already said "ain't"
What is a Cain administration going to do send out a translation manual to world leaders they can follow his "special language?"
- 1 vote
The "I'm fixin to" is a southern thing - I catch myself saying it sometimes - and people who are from around here think I'm an idiot.
bdubofttexas
There are idiots (as seen on TV) and then there are the rest of us who do and say silly things that make us feel stupid.
I'm thinking you are the 2nd....like most of us......most definitely me!
He's from Georgia so I am sure it'll slip out at some point.
:)
oh
my
@!$%#ing
god.
...
wow! do you suppose "the Cain defense" would work in criminal court?
"yes, your Honor, i robbed that bank, shot the teller in the face, kidnapped a 7-year-old as a hostage, ran down the 87-year-old nurse in the famous Time Square Kiss photo, remained on the lam for over 2 years during which i forced the hostage kid to get high on heroin and cocaine with me in addition to serially raping her before eventually killing and dismembering her, scattering her remains across 7 states and 2 other countries, but saving her brains to eat... but look at all the times i didn't do that!"
- 21 votes
yeah right that thousands is going to get him elected, I wonder how many are women in that group?
- 9 votes
Illeism worked great for Bob Dole... lol
more material for SNL :)
- 3 votes
He is a narcissist. Pig. Skimey. Creepy.
That audience was despicable.
I'm sorry we should have safe guards in place so as to not derail nor distract from our process that when a candidate is called to the floor with allegations of ANY misconduct that they are either removed from candidacy or suspended from campaigning, fundraising, debating until the allegations are either proven true or not.
- 11 votes
I got to say...I knew Cain was lying....I have my doubts with the first accuser...in the end Cain benbefits from the rights dream for their kind of BLACK man that can handle the whip.....who forgets the background of which he comes from for the benefit of "Pleasing" those that who...wink wink....see beyond color...LOLOLOLOLOL...LOL...LOLOL....yeah right LOOK AGAIN.....Take the blinders off.
- 6 votes
He truly is a sellout and in days gone by, he's what they'd called a House Negro! (to put it mildly)
- 7 votes
TAC...not you...but understand not all slaves where whipped by their white master's....some were whipped by someone that would represent Cain.
Thanks for putting it mildly.....it is a good site that MANY wouldn't understand the "House Comment".....sad or catering to those that they think will help them...ie Cain
- 3 votes
No not me (thanks)...one of my friends summed him up best:
"Cain would've been one of those Africans that sold other Africans into slavery and if his sister tried to escape he would tell the slave driver...she hidin' under that haystack massa"...
"a lot of blacks are brainwashed into voting for Democrats"
"blacks are too poor to be Republicans"
"I'm a Koch Brother from another mother - and proud of it"
- 12 votes
Cain would've been one of those Africans that sold other Africans into slavery and if his sister tried to escape he would tell the slave driver...she hidin' under that haystack massa"...
TAC...enough said....Cain is someone that I would defend someone saying he is an "Uncle Tom" because he truly isn't....He is a Sambo or Gumbo!!!! Read the story Uncle Tom is a compliment and he is not a compliment but only for himself which means that he identifies with any color other than hispanic and black.....he needs help
- 6 votes
Wow! I was wondering when all the racist comments would surface! And, these comments from the "see no color" and upstanding card carrying liberals?
Wow, just WoW!
What these comment represent is not racism, but what such a person as Herman Cain is perceived to be in the historical perspective of slavery.
I suppose that some posters here on the vine are aware that I am black (Lord knows, I've said it enough times), and though I would not dare speak for the sensibilities of all black people in this country......
I will say that as a Democrat and a Liberal, and an intelligent person, I will take the same stance as these posters have taken in accurately depicting what that factual historical perspective is as being descriptive of exactly what Herman Cain is.
I am not offended and I support the depictions. There is something strangely curious about your supposedly being so offended......IMPO.
- 5 votes
Time ran out on the remainder of my comment, so let me finish.
There is plenty of videotaped evidence of who attends those campaign stomps of Herman Cain. If any historically aware black person was asked to describe Herman Cain's way of appealing to that crowd of mostly whites, then you would probably be surprised to hear that calling him an Uncle Tom or a house negro is certainly a lot kinder than what such a truly knowledgeable black person would truly call him.
There is also plenty of videotaped evidence of who attended those Teaparty healthcare rallies where the President was depicted as an African witchdoctor with a bone in his nose, and every verbally offensive sign that was shown that had nothing to do with their objections to healthcare legislation. It had to do with the President's race, and you know it.
The messages from the Teaparty would have sufficed without all the racist actions.
Videotape is mother in this technological world of today, so before you attempt to show some manner of being offended by what you believe to be racist from liberals, check your own past actions and words for what you dismissed concerning the actions of the Teaparty/ Republican/Rightwing.
At this point, your slip is showing.
- 5 votes
Actually, I've been waiting on him to break out the tap dancing shoes.
Then you would probably see throngs of black people show up to whup his as......nevermind.
- 1 vote
Thank you and I'm black too and I stand by every word...
- 3 votes
Actually, I've been waiting on him to break out the tap dancing shoes.
Kind of reminds me of Mr. Bojangles maybe he can wear Sammy's suit as well...lol
- 3 votes
what hermy was going to say was so many blonds so little time.
- 8 votes
Jeezus H. Christ, Cain is just seriously @!$%#ing stupid.
- 11 votes
I realize this is probably a gaffe and not at all what he intended to communicate, but its still pretty funny.
- 11 votes
It seems that everything Cain says is a gaffe. Even that remark about Nancy Pelosi - after he said it he said I shouldn't have said it. This guy needs to think before he opens his mouth. And then think again.
The remark he made on Jimmy Kimmel the other night - he said I almost said something my handlers said I shouldn't - then he still slips up.
It seems like everytime he opens his mouth - his brain is not engaged.
That seems true for just about every GOP candidate - but Cain really takes the cake.
- 3 votes
It seems that everything Cain says is a gaffe. Even that remark about Nancy Pelosi - after he said it he said I shouldn't have said it.
No he said in effect that he shouldn't have said it because the press is on his ass about it. Here is the apology. From CNN and you can watch the video.
"I apologize for calling her 'Princess Pelosi,' if that's the biggest story you all have, OK?" Cain told reporters after addressing supporters at a diner in Ypsilanti, Michigan.
When asked why he apologized, the former pizza executive said, "So you all will stop asking me about it, OK?"
He didn't apologize, he tried to shut up the questions. The man has no sense of shame or remorse. He is yet another in a long lone of CEO and politician psychopaths and sociopaths that rise to power in this country of twisted priorities.
- 3 votes
I don't understand why Mr. Cain is being considered a serious candidate for President, when on the Rachel Maddow show she pointed out that in one of his closing statements in a debate he participated in he used a line from a Pokeman Movie as a closing statement. That being said, I fail to see what thousands of people who may or may not believe his actions were about the sexual harassment charges has any relevance to what really happened. I find it hard to believe the women that made the charges want to be humiliated on National T.V by admitting their personal rights had been infringed upon by Mr. Cain. Especially in they way they claim they were.
- 7 votes
He's not a serious candidate - he's a Koch Brothers bought & paid for diversion to provide temporary cover for Mitt Romney and his many positions on every issue.
Cain is now on the way out and pretty soon we'll get to see Mitt in full flip flop mode...paving the way for President Obama to be re-elected.
- 17 votes
Cain was never a serious candidate. Only in his dreams. Along with the wet ones.
- 1 vote
Cain: Cover up, cover up, cover up. That is plan A, B, and C. His idea is to talk a sweet and nice guy story.
He is pandering for support as the victim. He protests that he is innocent.
Why has he by now not had 1,000 signatures from friends, family, peers, associates, that can attest to his good character and can vouch that he is now a womanizer.
Why should the American people accept his word only for it? Can't he develop evidence to prove he did not sexually harass. Doesn't he have an alibi?
The severance agreements in question are legal settlements, because, they contain a great deal of verbiage that there is a waiver and release of all rights to sue the employer and the alleged employer agent perpetrator. Severance agreements can be both before a lawsuit and after a lawsuit.
These two women had lawyers. There were damage claims in progress. It was not an agreement, but a settlement. Cain agains is lying about that agreement vs settlement garbage. He is playing the voters as suckers and stupid.
Cain was okay with paying hush money, especially as it was not out of his pocket. He dumped it on his employer, making them pay the tab for his misconduct. If he dumped that on his employer, we can only imagine how he will dump his mistakes on the US Govt and taxpayers should he live in the White House.
Many companies fight such charges hard and long, especially if the CEO perpetrator demands his day in court, etc. He said that his integrity is the most important thing in the world to him. If so, then why did he not fight the charges and go to court to prove the two women as liars.
Cain did not want his day in court. Cain has not even indicated to the media that he was fighting to stop the settlements. That implies that he was fine and dandy about the settlements, as hush money.
Wake up America and smell the coffee. Cain is a liar and evader and cover up pro. With 4 women saying he was a womanizer, that is big time proof enough to disqualify him from the top job in the world.
- 6 votes
This man just does not get it. His ego is to big. First one-doubt. Then two - raised eyebrow. Then three - both eye-bows. Then Four - tipping point. Now Five - something is going on and it is not mutual fun.
He should quit and try to convince his wife he did nothing or it was just a fling orit meant nothing or they came on to him (he is soooo desirable) and he rejected them (now they are mad). Same old same old.
- 10 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



